Archive for the ‘Thailand’ Category
Cross-border mobility of capital and labor between economic equals poses few problems and offers many benefits but that kind of economic integration is not possible between grossly unequal economies. Although a controlled flow of labor from the poor country may have economic benefits for the rich country, it must strictly control labor flow from the poor country to prevent its high value labor market and social institutions from being overwhelmed by a large number of workers seeking higher wages. Similarly, even though the poor country needs capital investment from the rich country, it must control its flow and extent to keep its relatively tiny asset market from being overwhelmed by the relatively huge money supply of the rich country. Both of these concerns are motivated by economic stability issues and neither may be described as xenophobia. It is not reasonable to expect these countries to have either reciprocal labor flow agreements or reciprocal capital flow agreements.
In 2005 they were telling us that biofuels are the answer to global warming and that we should all “go green” by consuming renewable biofuels instead of fossil fuels. In fact they went so far as to put biofuel consumption and production as “offsets” in the strange mathematics of carbon emission “reduction” used by the industrialized countries to meet their Kyoto targets. Around 2008, when Indonesia and other Asian countries responded to this call with an aggressive biofuels program we were told that these activities were bad for the environment and for biodiversity and that biofuels actually caused global warming. And now in 2010 we find that biofuels are being promoted once again to fight global warming (Jet biofuel to take flight from 2012, Bangkok Post, August 18, 2010). Is “the science” really “settled” on the global warming issue? If so what is the “consensus” on the question of biofuels?
Greenpeace Thailand found toxic chemicals in the sediment of the Chao Phraya River and is demanding that the Pollution Control Department of Thailand take action to clean up the waterways in that region (Greenpeace calls for waterway clean-up, Bangkok Post, August 18, 2010). It is good to see environmental activists addressing real environmental issues after being absent from that arena for more than a a decade possibly because of their obsession with carbon dioxide.
The massacre of an aid group would rank as a war atrocity if the Taliban recognized such acts or terms.
The aid group was wiped out, he said, because they were American spies and preaching Christianity.
This would be a shocking cruel justification if it were true.
In the event, however, the Taliban leadership is lying.
The members of the group were Christian but never had preached their religion.
If the Taliban is to be denied a return to power and terrorist sponsorship, much effort will be required.
An infrastructure of altruistic foreigners is vital to help Afghans build a decent country.
The Taliban will crush decent people and goals.
Pyongyang backhanded the United Nations.
International observers determined the events that sank the Cheonan.
The government has repeatedly slapped the UN and other diplomatic groups.
North Korea is a long-time security threat.
Pyongyang should stop its rabble-rousing threats.
South Korea has conducted military exercises without a threat towards North Korea.
Instead of UN engagement with North Korea, the world is left with large war games.
China is giving North Korea cover for the most scandalous and harmful behavior.
The continual shielding of North Korea is a shocking act by China.
North Korea denied the act.
That was a serious act of war.
North Korea increased tension in the region with a number of steps.
North Korea could lower the growing tension with merely a few steps.
It is possible to agree that Mr Korkaew might say something harsh.
The law does not recognise that a person might violate the law by speech.
There is a need to take action against illegal writing or speech which incites.
The blocking of websites has spread the idea that censorship is a policy and weapon of the government and other authorities.
Such questionable censorship seems to have gained ground.
The censorship board has the power to gag TV and radio material before it is broadcast.
The EC may believe Mr Korkaew will go beyond speech permitted by election candidates.
Under common practice and the Constitution, each citizen has freedom of speech.
Mr Praphan said that the speeches, which he has not heard, could be inappropriate.
All through August of 2008 the National Disaster Warning Centre of Thailand warned citizens living in Bangkok and Samut Prakarn provinces to prepare for disaster because the worst storm and storm surge in 50 years was predicted to hit the region in August or September.
The forecasters said that the storm would have winds of 118 km/hr, waves 2.2 to 4.5 meters, and a huge storm surge that would wipe out everything in its path. These warnings appeared in various forms almost daily in newspapers and television and caused widespread panic and economic cost in the affected regions.
The dreaded storm surge never came. The heroic weather forecasters who had become media darlings overnight quietly faded from public view and the whole sordid affair was soon forgotten.